Search for: "United States v. Real Estate One, Inc." Results 181 - 200 of 685
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Simon Property Group Inc. alleges that Simon, the largest public real estate company in the United States, and a major force in shopping malls, violated the Sherman Act’s prohibitions against monopolization and unreasonable restraints of trade. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:06 am by Gerald Maatman, Jr.
Not unlike real estate, location – in terms of venue, the assigned judge, and applicable circuit case law – is an all-important factor in class certification dynamics. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 11:20 am
Background "There is hardly a political question in the United States which does not sooner or later turn into a judicial one. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:19 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner retained a real estate developer and former neighbor to design a custom residence with over 6,400 square feet of living space at an estimated cost of $1.25 million. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:40 am by John L. Welch
For purposes of this chapter, a mark shall be deemed to be in use in commerce-- ... on services when it is used or displayed in the sale or advertising of services and the services are rendered in commerce, orthe services are rendered in more than one State or in the United States and a foreign country and the person rendering the services is engaged in commerce in connection with the services. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:13 pm by William W. Abbott
  For questions relating to this article or any other California land use, real estate, environmental and/or planning issues contact Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. at (916) 456-9595. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:25 am
Allied Stores Int’l, Inc., as well as by the United States Supreme Court’s 1980 decision in Pruneyard Shopping Center v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm
"  Louisiana Wholesale at *3 (citing Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
The Commonwealth further stated that its protocol would not violate [Gelfgatt’s] rights under . . . the 5h Amendment to the United States Constitution. . . . [read post]