Search for: "United States v. Regents of University of California"
Results 181 - 200
of 248
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
California Department of Fish and Game, et al. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:58 am
The universities’ views show the degree to which Schuette, while ostensibly involving an equal protection issue, also raises a fundamental structural question about interest-group capture of state-level governmental units, and what citizens lawfully may do about it. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:42 am
The Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:36 am
On January 23, 2013, a group of major universities and technology transfer offices filed an amicus brief urging the United States Supreme Court to affirm the Federal Circuit in Monsanto v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 4:16 pm
Hart In Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am
Constitution (Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v Regents of the University of Michigan, November 15, 2012, Cole, R). [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
Nor does it make sense for the Court to warn schools – for the third time, after University of California Regents v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:58 am
(Judge Klein's lengthy opinion, Assoc. of Retired Employees, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm
Board of Trustees of the California State University (2012) __ Cal.App.4th __, 2012 WL 2832858 (cert. for pub. 6/28/12), which applied some CEQA basics in clarifying what “impacts” of a project must be analyzed and mitigated under CEQA. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm
Board of Trustees of the California State University (2012) __ Cal.App.4th __, 2012 WL 2832858 (cert. for pub. 6/28/12), which applied some CEQA basics in clarifying what “impacts” of a project must be analyzed and mitigated under CEQA. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:07 am
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:52 am
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
On two occasions, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica)… [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am
(TorrentFreak) United Kingdom BBC sets out social network picture use policy (Out-Law) UK Government responds to the Hargreaves review: Intellectual Property is important for economic growth (IP Whiteboard) (IP Osgoode) Full steam ahead for UK Digital Economy Act despite enforcement uncertainty (IP Osgoode) Database rights – Bingo for Binley’s as fictional seeds bear fruit: Beechwood House Publishing Limited (t/a Binleys) v Guardian Products Ltd and another (1709… [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
The Regents of the University of California v. [read post]