Search for: "United States v. Vance" Results 181 - 200 of 316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Tipton    Eastern District of Kentucky at London 08a0400n.06  2008/07/02 United States Surety Company v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-799; Vance v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:26 am by Joy Waltemath
After the defendant arranged for her to obtain a visa and passport, the employee left the Philippines and flew to the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:04 am by Lisa Whittaker
After putting employees on the ropes with its decision in Vance v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 10:01 am by Preston Lim
Shortly after Vavilov’s birth, the family moved to France and then to the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
United States], in which the Supreme Court decided that the warrant-less seizure of the plaintiff’s cell phone records violated his Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Julia Solomon-Strauss, Stephen Szrom
The next session of the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri is currently scheduled to begin Feb. 12. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 4:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
It states (among other things) that "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm by John Malcolm
These subpoenas — born, one suspects, out of enmity for this president — implicate important issues of separation of powers and federalism, including: the legitimate scope of congressional oversight; the ability of a state prosecutor to investigate and possibly indict a sitting president; whether United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:11 am by William Ford
Vance Spath placed the United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]