Search for: "United States v. Bin Laden"
Results 181 - 198
of 198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Nice Guy, and I suspect that he wants Edward Snowden’s head on a platter just as much, if not more, than he wanted Osama Bin Laden. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:13 am
Supreme Court and justices agreed that current system was a violation of the Geneva Convention as well as the United States Uniform Code of Military Justice. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
He met with Osama bin Laden twice, both before and after the attacks of 9/11. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
One official explained the underlying theory, which held that ISIL amounted to a partial successor to al Qaeda: Based on ISIL’s longstanding relationship with al-Qa’ida (AQ) and Usama bin Laden; its long history of conducting, and continued desire to conduct, attacks against U.S. persons and interests, the extensive history of U.S. combat operations against ISIL dating back to the time the group first affiliated with AQ in 2004; and ISIL’s position –… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:13 pm
One of the Obama administration’s main arguments in support of warrantless GPS tracking is the high court’s 1983 decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
In 2017, in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 9:39 am
So, for example, if you email a friend in France and in the content discuss Osama Bin Laden, the email could be included as “about” a target. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 12:45 pm
Other testimony showed that Mehanna and co-conspirators considered attacks within the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
We found bin Laden. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:05 am
Habib, who is Australian, had been one of the four petitioners in Rasul v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 5:37 pm
V) MALVEAUX: Congressman Clyburn earlier said today, "I think he can afford to tone it down. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:36 pm
Kavanaugh acknowledges that “[i]ndependent agencies are constitutional under Humphrey’s Executor v. the United States” before adding that “what is constitutional is not always wise. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 7:23 pm
Anomalous Results Peter’s “anomalous results” argument is that “Under [my] view, the former bin Laden aide al Bahlul, who has no U.S. ties, would gain greater protection under Article III than would a citizen of Missouri who aided the Confederacy during the Civil War. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
It was also a victory for the United States Constitution. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am
Regardless, plaintiffs argued that they were entitled to strict scrutiny because required “sexually explicit” labels on video games had been struck down by the Seventh Circuit, and Brown v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Entrapment has similarly failed as a defence in terrorism prosecutions in the United States. [read post]
