Search for: "Waters v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 4,949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2007, 10:04 am
EPA "recalls the previous high-water mark of diluted standing requirements, United States... [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:04 pm by Bill Ward
At the heart of this case is a question similar to those that are under consideration by the United States Supreme Court in the Florida case, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am by Miriam Seifter
By defining the key statutory term “waters of the United States,” the rule determines, among other issues, which water bodies are subject to the act’s discharge limitations and permitting requirements. [read post]
Today, the Supreme Court has once again assisted in the United States’ centuries-long attempts to try to get out of the promises they have made to Tribal Nations by stating that treaties only secure access to water, but do not require the United States to take any steps to protect or provide that water to our people. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on October 29, 1963. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:15 pm by Kevin
United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat and 982.34 Pounds of American Paddlefish Caviar (hereinafter, United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:40 am by Larisa Vaysman
In February of last year, we reported on the Sixth Circuit’s split-panel holding that it had jurisdiction to review challenges to the validity of the “Clean Water Rule” (which clarifies the term “waters of the United States” in the Clean Water Act). [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:40 am by Amy Howe
” The CWA defines navigable waters as “waters of the United States. [read post]
Brief Overview of “Waters of the United States” The Supreme Court previously considered the scope of “waters of the United States” under the CWA in 2006 in Rapanos. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 8:36 am by Steven Cohen
Mark Twain Water Zone, LLC et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Missouri – August 3, 2022) involves a personal injury claim. [read post]
Hawkes[i] involves a jurisdictional determination from the United States Corps of Engineers (the Corps) that found that a landowner’s wetlands comprises “waters of the United States” subject to Clean Water Act jurisdiction. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
The petition of the day is: United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]