Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 181 - 200
of 6,909
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2015, 11:53 am
But I don't know. [read post]
BECAUSE WE HAVE THE POWER TO FUCK OUR CLIENTS - The Jefferson Parish Indigent Defender Board Edition
1 Feb 2011, 1:45 pm
That's offensive, but I don't know that I'd have written about the case if that's all there were here. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:09 am
"Of course, we don't know yet how the judge is going to rule, but this order suggests that she is taking the issue seriously," she said. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 5:28 am
"It's a shame to think that somebody agrees to do this work, they do the work that they're asked to do ... to be a zealous advocate for somebody who's accused of a crime," Hoffman said, "and then when they finish that somebody can come back and say, 'I know you did good work ... but we don't feel like we should pay you for all the work that you did.'… [read post]
3 Nov 2012, 10:36 am
Law firms and lawyers are not immune from the economic downtown caused by too many ridiculous wars that we should not be in, crashing realestate values, greedy wall street investors who don't give a damn about anything, president Bush endless spending and the like. [read post]
25 Sep 2006, 8:47 am
Today's New York Times report on tribunals in that state makes clear the hazards of low standards for justice: "Some of the courtrooms are not even courtrooms: tiny offices or basement rooms without a judge's bench or jury box. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 9:54 am
Weinstein, "I don't know if we can overcome the problem, because we're not in charge of the questions. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 9:35 am
We regret that, because of our own HT involvement here in Philly, we probably can't do it justice.There are two kinds of HT cases (actually, a lot more than two kinds, depending on the criteria, but humor us) - those involving HT with some form of progesterone, and those that don't. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 1:05 pm
We don't care. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:23 am
We don’t tell the court how to rule once it has applied the test required by the First Amendment. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 6:49 am
Juror #1 (raises hand): I don't have a car. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 8:50 am
We can't say we're entirely surprised by this story. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:02 am
I don't say that backlash is inevitable but I do think the risk is real. [read post]
24 Sep 2016, 5:04 am
Don't lie and pretend no cases are affected when they are; don't scapegoat your employees; don't downplay the concerns of rape victims who think their rape kits should be tested; don't conceal or whitewash a serious mess that will require community involvement and extra resources to fix. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:00 am
Heck, people are starving right here in the United States -- but we don't confiscate the property of the rich to save the poor. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
From this constitutional perspective, for example, we have strong reason to defend depth in administrative adjudication, insofar as it means protecting administrative judges from their bosses of all stripes---whether that be the policy sides of their own agencies or the President---in order to ensure that the interests of individuals aren't sacrificed in favor of the policy goals of either. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
There is only one real reason: we don't want folks to go to trial. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:30 pm
Can't say we have ever heard of the good judge, but that doesn't mean much.Judge Rodney Smith. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 5:05 am
He is a great and talented attorney who wins very tough cases that most other lawyers don't have the guts to even try. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:27 am
Don't let them try to claim they didn't foresee danger. [read post]
