Search for: "Williamson v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 837
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2019, 5:35 am by Jackie McDermott
In the United States, to implement such a system via constitutional amendment, the process laid out by Article V requires that two-thirds of both houses of Congress propose the amendment, or that the amendment arises from a convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am by Yvette Mabbun and Kelly Vazhappilly
First, the majority stated that the Williamson County holding was not consistent with precedent or workable for litigants, as illuminated by San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 5:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
 Knick overruled the 34-year-old precedent in Williamson County requiring that federal takings claimants seek compensation in state court before being allowed to proceed in federal court. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Conference of State Legislators Blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Georgia v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:17 pm by Patricia Salkin
The majority opinion criticized Williamson County for its reliance on Ruckelshaus v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 8:55 am by Walter Olson
It overrules the unsound 1985 precedent to the contrary of a case called Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 3:15 am by Wally Zimolong
For nearly 36 years, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:50 pm by Ben Rubin
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed, relying on Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:23 pm by Tim Paone
In Knick, the Court wiped out the “state-litigation requirement” of Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm by Mark Walsh
The high court took up the case to reconsider its 1985 decision in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]