Search for: ""citizen's united""
Results 1981 - 2000
of 3,933
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2012, 4:29 pm
Greenberg 1028 Reconciling Caperton and Citizens United: When Campaign Spending Should Compel Recusal of Elected Officials Samuel P. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:36 am
Book description: The new streamlined and student-friendly Fifth Edition of Election Law: Cases and Materials fully covers developments in election law in the 2012 election season including; extensive coverage of Citizens United, super PACs, and other campaign finance developments; emerging issues in voting rights and redistricting, including coverage of the Texas redistricting and voter identification cases; and new coverage of issues in judicial elections. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:48 pm
Bopp was an attorney in the well-known Citizens United case, which led to the U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:41 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:45 am
Supreme Court struck down such limits in the Citizens United case, Judge Aspen concluded that preventing actual and apparent corruption cannot justify restrictions on independent expenditures. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:28 am
“Can State Laws Cohabit With Citizens United? [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:44 am
But the Democrats were so crazed in 2010 by Citizens United, so convinced that anyone's new political money might bust their hold on power, that they sicced the most feared agency in government on people who disagreed with them. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 12:45 pm
This seminar will provide information covering topics such as the aftermath of Citizens United, state and federal pay-to-play laws, state lobbying, gift and campaign finance laws and enforcement, FEC rulemakings and litigation, FEC hot topics, and, among other things, recent civil and criminal enforcement cases, policies and sentencing guidelines. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:18 pm
The court found that after Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:01 pm
.: Citizens United, McDonald, and the Future of Corporate Constitutional Rights, 86 New York University Law Review 887 (2011) Candice Nelson, Grant Park: The Democratization of Presidential Elections 1968-2008 (Brookings 2011) [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
Find out the answer and have a bit of weekend fun by checking out this Sesame Street appearance in which Justice Sonia Sotomayor puts down her taza de café (she and her host kaffee-klatsch in Spanish as well as English) and struts her solomonic stuff:Hat tip to Bridget Crawford at Faculty Lounge for news of this appearance, which follows fast upon the interview between retired Justice John Paul Stevens, author of a stinging dissent in the campaign finance case, Citizens… [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 10:30 am
If your answer is Citizens United, think again,” Winkler discusses his new book with host Dahlia Lithwick. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:21 am
" National Journal reports that "Scalia Defends 'Citizens United,' Reflects on Term in Rare TV Appearance. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 12:51 pm
We have previously released eleven other briefs in our nomination series, on abortion, “don’t ask, don’t tell,” working with the right, gender diversity on the Court, Citizens United, diversity hiring, executive power, judicial qualifications, gun rights, Presidential privilege, and ideology. [read post]
7 May 2012, 7:18 am
I don't think it will become the next Citizens United or Ledbetter in terms of political profile, but let's hope articles like this can help Concepcion start to permeate voter consciousness and build support for reform. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 10:09 am
Walter Olson: “Rights-bearing individuals do not forfeit those rights when they associate in groups” argue my Cato colleagues Ilya Shapiro and Caitlyn McCarthy in the John Marshall Law Review [SSRN via Cato at Liberty]: Much of the criticism of Citizens United stems from the claim that the Constitution does not protect corporations because they are not “real” people. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:44 pm
Bussiere Page 1749 The Incorporation of Democracy: Justice Kennedy’s Philosophy of Political Participation in Citizens United Jarrod L. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:43 am
Of course, as my readers point out, if this is what it means, it is a perverse holding: those groups which should be entitled to the most First Amendment protections (even under Austin and before Citizens United, such groups could spend their treasury funds independently on candidate campaigns) get the least protection. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:14 am
Supporters of the ordinance hope it will be a model law for other cities to stem the flow of money in politics after Citizens United. [read post]
26 May 2012, 1:54 pm
Among other arguments, they urged the Court not to consider developments in campaign finance since the Court’s 2010 ruling that is centrally at issue: Citizens United v. [read post]
