Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 51,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2009, 9:57 am
So the California Supreme Court gets the case. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
The seminal case, Greenman v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
You may not have heard of the lawsuit Hurrell-Harring v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am
Background Few people would demur from Parliament’s acknowledgement of the vital importance of education. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 12:50 pm
The Feb. 26, 2007 ruling of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 9:52 am
In Atlantic Recording v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:17 pm
In Arista Records v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:01 am
In Arista v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:28 am
In Arista v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 1:10 pm
The RIAA has filed its papers opposing the defendant's dismissal motion in a Pennsylvania case, SONY BMG Music v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 1:29 pm
In a pro se Georgia case, SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 1:01 pm
People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:35 am
In addition to overreaching the people whom they are to serve, three officers wasted one-half day watching four others embarrass themselves. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Plaintiffs faced with the prospect of these harms might choose not to litigate: People who were sexually assaulted, for instance, might be reluctant to continue with their lawsuits once pseudonymity is denied; likewise for people who have been libeled, or who have been pretextually fired by their employers. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 7:57 am
Case citation: M.H. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 7:50 am
The impression that certain objectionable statements made upon the jury was at the heart of the recently decided case of State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:55 pm
Chief Justice Robert’s opinion in Halo v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 3:00 pm
By Eric Goldman United States v. [read post]
Case Law, Australia: O’Reilly v Edgar, Fact free Facebook Posts, $250,000 damages – Gabrielle Hunter
23 Mar 2019, 5:02 pm
In the case of O’Reilly v Edgar ([2019] QSC 24) the Supreme Court of Queensland awarded Kelvin O’Reilly, the CEO of a go-kart racing organisation, $270 658.71 in damages, including aggravated damages, for defamatory posts by a Facebook troll. [read post]
