Search for: "People v. House" Results 1981 - 2000 of 11,169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2021, 12:02 pm by ACLU
s=20In Illinois, a federal court ordered the Department of Corrections to take immediate steps to improve housing and health care conditions for transgender people. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case shows us what it's all about.The case is United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Richard Pildes
Remarkably, the Court has only focused on this substantive question at all in one case, Burns v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 6:39 am
People v Scott, 79 N.Y.2d 474, 498-499, 593 N.E.2d 1328, 583 N.Y.S.2d 920; People v Burger, 67 N.Y.2d 338, 344, 493 N.E.2d 926, 502 N.Y.S.2d 702). [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 6:42 am
People v Scott, 79 N.Y.2d 474, 498-499, 593 N.E.2d 1328, 583 N.Y.S.2d 920; People v Burger, 67 N.Y.2d 338, 344, 493 N.E.2d 926, 502 N.Y.S.2d 702). [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 9:43 am by Matthew Nelson
In People v King, the Court of Appeals held that a registered qualifying patient under the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA) may only avoid prosecution for cultivating marihuana under § 8 of the Act if he has complied with other applicable sections of the MMMA. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:46 am by R. David Donoghue
In addition to two days of excellent continual legal education and meeting many interesting people, I also spoke with in-house counsel from Microsoft and Hewlett Packard about how to limit fees in intellectual property litigation (more on that panel soon). [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am by S
Second,in Harrison v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 1736, the Court of Appeal held that the right only extended to those person who cared for children who would otherwise be compelled to leave the country.Finally, in R (Sanneh) v SSWP [2013] EWHC 793 (Admin), the Administrative Court held that the provision of subsistence payments and accommodation under s.17, Children Act 1989 were sufficient to ensure that an individual would not be compelled to leave the UK.In R (HC) v SSWP… [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 11:36 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
  In response, the Project stated that such rights may be more limited than the legal rights people have, and may not necessarily include the right to file lawsuits. [read post]