Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF Vs." Results 1981 - 2000 of 4,571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2022, 10:36 am by Florian Mueller
Earlier this week I expressed my view that even superstar appellate lawyer Tom Goldstein may not be able to turn Epic's case against Apple around unless there's a lot of support for Epic Games in the form of amicus curiae briefs to be filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 11:38 pm by Madhulika Vishwanathan
Further according to the article, Glenmark states that its product is “non-infringing” on Merck’s drug. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 4:34 am
The received wisdom of the last copyright extension act is that it was purchased by a narrow class of intensely interested copyright holders at the expense of the public domain. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:26 pm by Lawrence Liang
In 2005 in the State of Gujarat vs Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat and Ors, the Supreme Court went much further and upheld the constitutionality of a total ban on the slaughters of cows and her progeny. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
”[10]  Information systems, and human economic and political interests, are in a constant state of flux. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:35 am by Mark A. Kastel
      His claim that organic food consumption in the United States is about 1 percent of the market is inaccurate. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 10:24 am
What is most interesting is the intensity of the reaction of UN entities. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
  Yet it is particularly interesting as the issue arises in the wake of the victory of Mr. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University, and the author of God vs. the Gavel: The Perils of Extreme Religious Liberty and Justice Denied: What America Must Do to Protect Its Children. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 10:13 am by ALDF
The Animal Legal Defense Fund had led a coalition to file an amicus brief in the case, State vs. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
And the court had already found there was no compelling interest in denying gays the right to marry. [read post]