Search for: "State v. Husband"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 7,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2014, 1:39 pm
The March 26, 2014 Court of Appeals opinion in Meehan v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
Huff v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:37 am
The case, LITTLEPAIGE v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
The appellant was stopped and searched upon arrival to East Midlands Airport after visiting her husband who was being held in French custody in relation to terrorist offences. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:49 am
Holder, Brief Facts - The petitioner, a Pakistani national, argued that despite multiple long absences from the United States, she did not intend to abandon her status, which also served as the foundation for her husband's and child's entry into the United States. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Texas, as well, to the states. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 4:10 pm
In her decision in Wong v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
Baines v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Loving v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:01 am
A recent United States Tax Court case, Quintal v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
Sandoval brought G.A.A.Q. to the United States in November 2017, to live with her, her new husband, and G.A.A.Q. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
This sounds like a classic Auto v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
However, as the New Jersey Supreme Court stated in the case of Mani v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:23 am
Plaintiff failed to return to Manhattan by the stated deadline under the settlement. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:04 am
Following the former husband’s failure to pay, the plaintiff commenced the instant action, inter alia, to recover on an account stated, alleging that the defendant failed to pay the [*2]plaintiff’s legal fees in connection with the matrimonial action. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:43 am
That's exactly what happened in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 9:25 am
And the Court stated that only the rankest speculation could lead to any other conclusion. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:37 am
From Justice Lawrence's opinion in Herbert v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:34 am
In Radu v Toader, 2011 WL 3418368 (E.D.N.Y.) [read post]
