Search for: "Able v. United States" Results 2001 - 2020 of 10,804
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
Judiciary Law § 510 provides that to be qualified as a juror a person must: (1) be a citizen of the United States, and a resident of the county, (2) be not less than eighteen years of age, (3) not have been convicted of a felony, and (4) be able to understand and communicate in the English language. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
First up is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Bankruptcy judges are appointed by majority vote of the judges within a United States Court of Appeals Circuit. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
Texas); and rejected (unanimously) the continued vitality of much-cited dicta from the Court’s 1934’s United States v. [read post]
Rather, this case will preclude future cases of human rights abuses against corporations where defendants are only able to allege “general corporate decision making” occurred in the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:45 am by John Ellis
On June 15, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its much anticipated decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:02 am by Karen T. Willitts, Esq.
In a November, 2013 decision published on March 10th of this year, in what appears to be the first decision of its kind not only in New Jersey but in the United States, a Superior Court judge in the matter of Plotnick v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:28 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
  As a practical matter suing someone with no assets in the United States would not make much sense as you would not be able to collect on the judgment unless they paid it voluntarily or had some mechanism to enforce the judgment against them where their assets are.IV. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:36 am
Davis of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has set up a clash between judges in that district over whether Virginia recognizes the “independent personal stake” exception to the intra-corporate immunity or intra-corporate conspiracy doctrine. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:59 am by INFORRM
   In England and any other common law jurisdiction (outside the United States), the damages would, at most have been in the low tens of thousands of pounds. [read post]