Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 51,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2022, 8:09 am
The case, Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
In a media release, the penal reform charity notes that in its experience of working in prisons, carrying out research and representing young people in custody, “segregating vulnerable and disturbed people tends to make their problems worse”. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:47 pm
I had never read Frank before, as the case is only of historical interest: It was overruled just 8 years later by Camara v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided the case of Utah v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:48 pm
Martin, Case No. 19-247—a decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that could jeopardize the ability of cities and counties to get people living on the streets into shelters and provide them with the services they need, and to move homeless people camping in hazard-prone areas to safety. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:22 pm
The case, Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
The threshold of seriousness Master Bell reflected upon two notable cases, Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] QB 946 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] 1 WLR 1985. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:45 am
Mitchell II: 76 percent to 24 percent Proves once again that people just don’t like paying taxes. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Court of Appeal Opinion: In re Cipro Cases I & II, 200 Cal.App.4th 442 (2011) People ex rel. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm
June 12th is Loving Day, a holiday celebrating the landmark case Loving v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 12:21 pm
That's a state law issue.On May 2nd, the court orders the case trailed because it's doing a different case. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 11:50 am
Like this one.It's a case from down here in San Diego with a typical fact pattern, but with a twist. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:40 am
And I had a keen sense that was the case here. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:45 pm
The defense counsel makes this issue a central point of his argument (since he's got, as in many cases, very little else to go on). [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
People don't do anything without reasons. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 11:11 am
And he cites a case from the California Supreme Court that reversed a drunk driving when a dude was found sleeping in his car, with the engine and lights on, that holds that (in that case) a conviction for "driving" while intoxicated requires proof of volitional movement. [read post]
5 May 2021, 1:18 pm
Gutman) and Roma people (Ms. [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:02 am
There are actually a surprising number of exceptions to that rule . . . but the amended judgment in People v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Samsung v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:20 am
Housing assistance – relevant domestic legislation The Housing Act 1996 (“Housing Act“) places local authorities under a duty, in cases of involuntary homelessness, to provide homeless people with accommodation unless they are not eligible for assistance. [read post]
