Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 2001 - 2020 of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2023, 2:37 pm by Gabriel Chin
Nevertheless, as the briefs in Smith v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 12:14 pm by Administrator
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: 1. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
 the English House of Lords applied a test that requires that the two works be compared as a whole: The inquiry involves a comparison between two works. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The Court considered the recent analysis of the English High Court’s power to grant injunctions in the case of Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting Limited ([2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch))(see our discussion here). [read post]
” The question for the court was the extent of the connection required between a foreign company and the UK to entitle an English court to wind it up, if its centre of main interests was in another member state of the European Union. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:39 am by Rose Hughes
Particularly, the agreement between GW and Otsuka stated that it was governed by New York Law. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:33 am
The Opinion has now been posted in ten official languages of the European Union, but not in English. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:29 pm by Glotzer & Sweat
 The first case I think is highly relevant is the 1975 California Supreme Court decision of Li v. [read post]