Search for: "People v. Case" Results 2001 - 2020 of 52,387
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2008, 1:10 pm
The RIAA has filed its papers opposing the defendant's dismissal motion in a Pennsylvania case, SONY BMG Music v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
 In addition to overreaching the people whom they are to serve, three officers wasted one-half day watching four others embarrass themselves. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiffs faced with the prospect of these harms might choose not to litigate: People who were sexually assaulted, for instance, might be reluctant to continue with their lawsuits once pseudonymity is denied; likewise for people who have been libeled, or who have been pretextually fired by their employers. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 7:50 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
The impression that certain objectionable statements made upon the jury was at the heart of the recently decided case of State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
In the case of O’Reilly v Edgar ([2019] QSC 24) the Supreme Court of Queensland awarded Kelvin O’Reilly, the CEO of a go-kart racing organisation, $270 658.71 in damages, including aggravated damages, for defamatory posts by a Facebook troll. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In a media release, the penal reform charity notes that in its experience of working in prisons, carrying out research and representing young people in custody, “segregating vulnerable and disturbed people tends to make their problems worse”. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 7:00 am by Matthew Kahn
Stockman, two cases challenging the Trump administration's ban on military service by transgender people. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:47 pm
I had never read Frank before, as the case is only of historical interest: It was overruled just 8 years later by Camara v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:48 pm by Skylar Hunter
Martin, Case No. 19-247—a decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that could jeopardize the ability of cities and counties to get people living on the streets into shelters and provide them with the services they need, and to move homeless people camping in hazard-prone areas to safety. [read post]