Search for: "People v. Lines" Results 2001 - 2020 of 11,898
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2012, 9:01 am by Eugene Volokh
We had seen this before in some past Confrontation Clause cases, such as Hammon v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:06 am by David Bernstein
This book gathers and carries forward a lot of the counter-historical work done to try and roll back a lot of the Lochner v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 2:47 pm by SHG
The problem is that Graham v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Gorsuch's concurrence pointed out: Members of this Court have long held that, "'[a]nytime a State is enjoined by a court from effectuating statutes enacted by representatives of its people, it suffers a form of irreparable injury.'" Maryland v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:56 am by SHG
In yet another decision demonstrating that a judge whose career was spent prosecuting can show the fortitude to suppress, Brooklyn Justice Mark Dwyer rejected the testimony of NYC Police Officer Robert McNamara, who falsely claimed consent to justify a search of an apartment to locate a weapon.In People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 8:15 pm by David Jacobson
These general observations have some truth, however, only because people do not stare at computer screens in quite the same way in which they stare at television screens and also because most people do not stare at billboards at all. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Carpenter relies on a line of Supreme Court authority, which culminated in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 10:30 am
I'll just have to give you the opening lines of the opinion and you'll readily see that it's consistent with today's theme:"April Elizabeth Mancini owns the Jah Healing Kemetic Temple of the Divine Church, Inc. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 2:14 pm
A survey shows that people do like the outcomes of most of the big Roberts Court cases, and that's out of line with the declining approval of the Court, but it might be that people are giving extra weight to some of the big cases, the ones they don't like — maybe Kelo (for Republicans) and Bush v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 10:33 am
Because the evidence does not allow reasonable people to come to differing conclusions on the issue of whether Indiana Bell breached its duty of reasonable care to Jones by not inspecting the pole, telephone line, and hardware in the absence of information that there was anything wrong, the trial court properly entered judgment on the evidence in favor of Indiana Bell.NFP civil opinions today (6): Francis W. [read post]