Search for: "United States v. Borders"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 3,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Rather than discussing how life will change for various groups of people in America, I want to engage in informed speculation about how the legal system in the United States will look in a few years. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 4:56 am
U.S., 267 U.S. 132 (1925), the rationale for the border search exception is that the United States – like other sovereign countries – is entitled to stop travelers at the border and search them and their belongings to ensure that contraband is not being brought into or taken out of the country. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm
The legislation restricts wetlands that the state can regulate to those considered “waters of the United States,” and it specifies that wetlands do not include prior converted cropland. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
United States? [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 11:01 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:00 am
Sloman, United States Attorney for the Southern District Jeffrey H. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:07 pm
United States, 20-1410, and Kahn v. [read post]
23 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
United Mine Workers of America, observed that it was not writing on a clean slate. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:15 am
United States, 2009 U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 7:59 am
That treaty (to which the United States and about 160 other nations are signatories) obligates nations to enforce arbitration agreements between businesses of member states. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; In United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:48 pm
US Customs and Border Protection et al. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 3:00 pm
" That was the right policy when the United States was small and weak. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:20 pm
Notes for: --Marbury v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:56 am
[State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 11:00 am
United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:28 pm
(a) In General- Chapter 401 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: `Sec. 40130. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 9:40 am
In State of California, ex rel, Xavier Becerra v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
” Experts criticized the decision as potentially limiting the United States’ ability to obtain a vaccine developed by a member of COVAX in the future. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:55 pm
The departure from the American approach appears to have occurred as early as in 1875 in United States v. [read post]
