Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 6,448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
For more about the People v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 5:41 am
However, in Alexander v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
Writing client-facing material using English as a second language? [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 3:04 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
Feltz Design Build Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 2:00 am
Evidence must always be sufficiently clear, convincing and cogent to satisfy the “balance of probabilities” test stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in F.H. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:17 pm
Today, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard arguments in ClearCorrect v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
The employee’s policy stated, in what the Supreme Court described as “admirably simple English”, that the insured was covered “if you have an accident in your vehicle and you kill or injure someone, you damage their property or you damage their vehicle”. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 9:30 am
Martin v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am
Texas has stated that it considers black and Latino students “under-represented” at the university, based in part on their proportions in the state population. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
Peruta v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am
More recently, in footnote 20 of its 1997 decision in Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 10:40 am
For thirty years the ex-husband in Janet O. v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
Against the backdrop of this coverage, the English and Welsh press protested vigorously about their being prevented from publishing information. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 3:15 pm
For example, in English & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
Therefore neither Essers nor Kazemeir were bound by an English jurisdiction clause in the original contracts between Exel and the respondents. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:55 pm
[Day v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 1:00 am
It noted that the House of Lords (in R (Clift) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] UKHL 54) had concluded that being treated differently due to one’s status as a prisoner did not come within the ambit of Article 14 discrimination. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:17 am
The trustees therefore sought to wind up OA in the English courts in order to gain this protection. [read post]
