Search for: "TAYLOR v. STATE"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 3,086
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
He noted that though the business community (along with NGOs and local governments) were excluded from the Paris negotiation these GHG programs might prove a good means creating robust governance beyond the state but in conjunction with states. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:34 pm
Young, Faculty Director, Joshua Beau Taylor, Student Director, and Benjamin J. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Taylor (07-539). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
R v Reeves Taylor, heard 24-25 Jun 2019. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 10:56 am
He is charged in the homicide of Breonna Taylor in a botched police raid. [read post]
28 May 2015, 10:45 am
Taylor v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Taylor (07-216). [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:09 am
The arbitrator ordered the County to restore the aides to full-time status [i.e., 35-hours per week] with back pay.A State Supreme Court judge vacated the award on the grounds that the arbitrator had misread the Taylor Law agreement. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 11:28 pm
Ct. 2729, 2733 (2011) (citando a United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:13 am
" United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 11:48 am
Thus, the Thibodeauxes cannot show as a matter of law that Section 230(c)(1) would bar GCC’s participatory-liability claims. * Taylor v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:17 am
Taylor Slip op. at 797. 490-day delay between arrest and trial did not violate Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial rights U.S. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:18 am
Challenging arbitration awards Coppa v State of New York, NYS Supreme Court, Justice A. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
In State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:07 am
” In David Scott Detrich v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 4:05 am
The Taylor Law [Section 209-a.6, Civil Service Law] provides that "in applying this [Article], fundamental distinctions between private and public employment shall be recognized, and no body of federal or state law applicable wholly or in part to private employment, shall be regarded as binding or controlling precedent. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm
Two separate challenges were before the court on Tuesday, but the justices spent most of their time and energy on the first case, which is known as Biden v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
