Search for: "Wells v. Unknown" Results 2021 - 2040 of 2,289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2011, 9:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
The challenge to Thomas is based upon three negative assessments: first, of the political advocacy of his wife Virginia, who has been a visible opponent of the new law and who earns a substantial income from that activity; second, of the sources of financial contributions to his wife’s advocacy, including some well-known conservative donors; and, third, of Thomas’s own associations with individuals who have given money to his wife’s causes as well as his… [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Abbott Labs case from 1999 held that a compound that was physically made and sold in claimed form was complete and available as prior art even though its structure and identity were unknown at the time of sale. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am by Bianca Saad
Supreme Court broke for recess at the end of June, it issued several landmark decisions, some of which have caught the attention of California businesses and employers for their potential — and in some cases unknown — impact. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Monica Goyal
The lack of regulatory oversight has largely been the reason behind the success virtually unknown companies have had in raising millions – sometimes hundreds of millions – of dollars through ICOs. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:36 am by David Kravets
At the moment, the targets of the litigation are unknown, even to Camelot. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 7:46 am by Elizabeth Lauderback
     Well, trouble in printing paradise followed. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am by Veronika Gaertner
Sebastian Mock: “Internationale Streitgenossenzuständigkeit” - the English abstract reads as follows: The international jurisdiction for claims against several defendants at the domicile of one of the defendants as today established by Art. 6 No. 1 Brussels I Regulation is unknown in several member states and consequently causes general doubts due to the existing possibilities of manipulation in this context. [read post]