Search for: "APPLICATION OF SHARP" Results 2041 - 2060 of 2,432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
’ In fact, consistent application of the presumption ‘preserv[es] a stable background against which Congress can legislate with predictable effects. [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This is why the Dagenais/Mentuck test should not be used to decide an application under art. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and de-branding of… [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Belgium - eBay wins ruling against L’Oreal in dispute over liability for counterfeit goods sold in online auctions: (Managing Intellectual Property), (Counterfeit Chic), (IPKat), (Class 46), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica) US CAFC holds that copying free software without complying with license is copyright infringement: Robert Jacobsen v… [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
New York's general public nuisance statute, however, was neither expressly nor impliedly applicable to guns. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(State laws on any subject must comply with federal constitutional principles that have been deemed applicable to the states.) [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Judgement was handed down by Dame Sharp, Lauing LJ and Warby LJ in Soriano v Forensic News LLC & ors [2021] EWCA Civ 1952 on 21 December 2021. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
On 11 May 2012, Sharp J handed down judgment in the case of King v Grundon. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:00 pm by MBettman
Chief Justice O’Connor got into a very sharp exchange with Lipson’s lawyer about whether the firm wanted addresses—he first said no, but then conceded the firm did. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 8:45 am by Samuel Bray
  (By contrast, a Dobbs "middle ground" would preserve nothing of Casey and have no sharp edges.) [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Since our last round up, Mrs Justice Sharp has been appointed to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 4:50 pm by Brandon Kain
The Supreme Court of Canada’s Van Breda Trilogy – and its judgment in Van Breda in particular – endorses a new approach to jurisdiction simpliciter focused on categories of prima facie jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 10:10 am
It is a specific application of the more general ‘fanny-pack’ principle [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
As a result, there was a sharp decrease in affordable residential construction and applications for the LIHTC.[28] Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the largest government-sponsored mortgage financers (GSEs) that previously constituted approximately 40 percent of LIHTC investment, withdrew from the LIHTC market in 2008 as their projected losses from the recession would offset their taxable income for the foreseeable future.[29] Fannie and Freddie were subsequently placed under… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and if so how it is applied, careful counsel will… [read post]