Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 51,974
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
The threshold of seriousness Master Bell reflected upon two notable cases, Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] QB 946 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] 1 WLR 1985. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 10:17 am
In People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 9:28 pm
People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:56 am
The case, Tsilhqot’in Nation v.... [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 1:38 pm
People v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
In 2008 the Supreme Court of Colorado decided an interesting case called People v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 3:01 pm
People v Garcia, 2007 NY Slip Op 10467 is an unusual case. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 10:46 am
Slater (the Monkey Selfie case), covered earlier here. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 4:09 pm
Over at Simple Justice, Scott Greenfield has an astonishing post about a criminal case that deserves much wider attention: People v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 9:01 am
So New York authorities seem to think; here's the Complaint in People v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 10:44 am
A recent Third Department case, People v Soriano, 2007 NY Slip Op 00445, is yet another example of how important it is on appeal to carefully scrutinize a trial court's jury charge on the issue of... [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:55 pm
The Michigan Supreme Court denied nine applications for leave to appeal on May 28, 2009, and remanded to the Court of Appeals the case People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 8:54 am
At issue in a recent New York Court of Appeals case, People v Gomcin, 2007 NY Slip Op 02590, was whether the lower court correctly determined that there was insufficient probable cause to support the... [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 11:35 am
In the recent case of The People v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 3:14 pm
The New York Court of Appeals considered that question in People v Grajales, 2007 NY Slip Op 01385, a case where 710.30 notice had been timely served relative to an identification of a robbery... [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:58 pm
However, as the case of Summer J. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:31 am
Justice Wiley seems right to me when he says that, under the statute, continuous sexual abuse of a child doesn't necessarily require an intent to sexually arose one's self, and that whatever the alleged flaws of the jury instruction given here, they don't really matter in this particular case, since the only alleged basis for defendant's digital penetration of this child was to "punish" her. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 11:25 am
In this particular case, the offense for which defendant was convicted is rape of an unconscious person.The evidence against the defendant is not, however, as strong as you often see. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 2:44 pm
Appellate courts grant lower courts huge leeway in this arena, so I'm not surprised in the slightest that the California Supreme Court finds that there was no reversible error.Nonetheless, I thought the dynamic in the trial court warranted at least mention.It's a murder case (of course), so at the penalty phase, the prosecution has the murdered victim's seven year old brother testify. [read post]
