Search for: "Eugene Volokh"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 8,651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2016, 9:56 am
Eugene Volokh reports that in NYC, the Human Rights Commission advises that you can be fined if you don’t refer to someone by the name and crackpot pronoun (“ze,” “hir”) that they prefer. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:41 pm
Eugene Volokh discusses the case of Kenneth M. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:03 am
Eugene Volokh has a post up on the topic, and he includes comments from UCLA sociologist Jack Katz (who is a lawyer himself). [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 4:24 pm
Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 1 (November 2007) ARTICLES "Necessary to the Security of a Free State" Eugene Volokh, 83 NOTRE DAME L. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:12 pm
Chicago city government joins Boston in threatening to use regulation to punish Chick-fil-A for its political views [Josh Barro, Eugene Volokh, earlier, Tim Carney] NYC hearing on Bloomberg soda ban “a pre-scripted event with a foregone conclusion” [ACSH] despite inclusion of Baylen Linnekin on witness list [Reason, Jacob Sullum] If calories are the point: “Hey, Mayor Mike, why not ban beer? [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:29 pm
I have usually used the Word template that Eugene Volokh posts on his website because many years ago I was told it would give me an "edge" at getting editors' attention. [read post]
4 May 2017, 9:05 pm
Howard Dean, in hole re: grasping legal status of “hate speech,” keeps digging [Eugene Volokh (“No, Gov. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:38 am
In The Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh discusses the pending cert petition in the case of Nebraska financial advisor and tea party activist Bob Bennie, who states that government regulators retaliated against him after he criticized President Barack Obama; Volokh maintains that the petition “isn’t just about correcting the error in this case; rather, the real question here is how appellate courts should make decisions about what would ‘chill an… [read post]
27 May 2022, 8:50 am
As Eugene noted last month, The Volokh Conspiracy is twenty years old. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:55 pm
(Eugene Volokh) My favorite regional Chinese cuisine is what I’ve seen called “Chinese Islamic,” though I suppose that it might just be the particular Chinese Islamic food that comes from Henan, a province in east central China. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 1:29 pm
If so, please drop me an e-mail at volokh at law.ucla.edu, and let me know when you might be free for a brief phone conversation. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 7:54 pm
Here's an excellent tip from Eugene Volokh, via The Blawgraphy:When you're editing someone else's work â€â [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 12:02 am
Eugene Volokh with this new post continues to do a strong job criticizing lower courts for sloppy and unsatisfactory reasoning when rejecting post-Heller Second Amendment claims by criminal defendants. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 11:50 am
And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Eugene Volokh has a post titled “Yale Law School, Judge Ho, Neutrals, and Secondary Boycotts; Even when there’s good reason to criticize universities, we should keep the students out of our battles. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 4:28 am
Eugene Volokh is a law professor, and a very highly regarded voice on First Amendment issues. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:55 pm
On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, hosts Bob Ambrogi and Craig Williams join First Amendment attorney Robert Bertsche, partner with the firm Prince Lobel Tye, LLP, and Eugene Volokh, founder and co-author of the popular blog, The Volokh Conspiracy, as they define First Amendment, and how it relates to censorship and hate speech. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 11:05 am
(Eugene Volokh) From United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm
Eugene Volokh points out that the Supreme Court's web site refers to the Court as engaging in Living Constitutionalism: This power of "judicial review" has given the Court a crucial responsibility in assuring individual rights, as well as in maintaining a "living Constitution" whose broad provisions are continually applied to complicated new situations. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 9:01 am
Nope: “strong presumption in favor of public access” not overcome [Eugene Volokh on Gilliard v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 6:50 am
I'm not offering up all the links here, but those interested in the contraceptive mandate cases should definitely check out: 1) The extensive series of posts Eugene Volokh has put up at the VC this week canvassing most if not all of the issues and angles in the cases. 2) Nelson Tebbe and Micah Schwartzman's arguments on Slate and Balkinization that accommodating the claimants here would violate the Establishment Clause. 3) Marc DeGirolami's post on the Center for Law and Religion… [read post]
