Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 2041 - 2060
of 13,877
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2019, 3:40 am
See, e.g., In re Raytheon Co., 202 USPQ 317, 319-20 (TTAB 1979) (evidence of record sufficient to establish acquired distinctiveness of a light-colored oval within a black rectangular carrier).The Board found that applicant's combination of colors, borders, and stylization are capable of distinguishing the source of his services. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:48 am
For employers, it provides a fitting opportunity to re-examine workplace romance and sexual harassment policies. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:15 pm
The successor must also sign the vehicle’s certificate of title on behalf of the deceased owner, e.g. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:28 am
See, e.g., Duro-Last, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 3:31 pm
(Plus they're pretty.) [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:30 am
So what are your rights if you're quarantined? [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:07 am
” In re Abcor Dev. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:47 pm
We’re in between a Legalzoom, which generates automated template, and a full service law firm, which prepares a customized contract. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:28 am
Be courteous with the other driver, but don’t place blame on either party (e.g. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 6:23 am
See, e.g., Tercero blog here. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 3:19 am
" See, e.g., In re Texas With Love, LLC, 2020 USPQ2d 11290, at *2 (TTAB 2020). [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 5:24 pm
(See, e.g., O.J.). [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 7:12 am
See, e.g., Ogden, Title; id. atcol. 2, ll. 31-32. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:00 pm
Or why someone installing material on a roof (as the petitioner undeniably did here) isn't okay to follow the regular old rules for someone installing roofing equipment -- e.g., shingles -- since the risk of falling seems equivalent whether you're installing shingles or solar panels. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 3:37 am
See, e.g., Herbko Int'l Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:11 am
See, e.g., Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 12:26 pm
Such advantage would not be gained through actions attributed to the efforts of the registrant; all she has done is make a savvy business decision (e.g. re-register an abandoned socialistic brand).Due to the strong cultural connotations of these brands, an undertaking which unfairly appropriates a socialistic brand would be in a uniquely advantageous position to benefit within these post-socialist territories from various social forces identified by semiotics, psychology, sociology… [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:26 am
If you’re the successful bidder for either (or both!) [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:58 am
In re Thomas D. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 5:37 am
Think we're "foolin? [read post]