Search for: "MATTER OF A J S" Results 2041 - 2060 of 19,320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2016, 6:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Upon consideration of the parties’ motions and supporting briefs, and for the reasons set forth below, the Nation’s motion for summary judgment is hereby DENIED, and DOI’s cross-motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 6:17 am by Yves Faguy
Fuelling the sense of déjà vu for Canadians is the arc of the story. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 12:39 pm
October 18, 2007)(Schneider, J.) dismissed the debtor's chapter 7 case as an "abuse" under section 707(b)(1) based on the "totality of the circumstances" test of section 707(b)(3). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:13 pm
 Second, let's assume she is ill. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:32 am by Daniel E. Cummins
May 25, 2010, Amesbury, J.), in which the Court granted the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, thereby dismissing the Plaintiffs’ claim for punitive damages in a motor vehicle accident case based upon the Defendant driver having been found guilty of violating the Motor Vehicle Code in permitting his vehicle to cross the center line of the roadway and impact the Plaintiff’s vehicle.In this matter, the Plaintiff had alleged in the Complaint… [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 4:42 pm
The Ninth Circuit holds that the defendant, J. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 4:06 am by Andrew Frisch
J & J left the itinerary and order of Smith’s visits to the target doctors to her discretion. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 9:48 pm
We aim for maximum accuracy around here, even as to trivial matters. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:41 am by The Docket Navigator
The court denied plaintiff's motion to reinstate a declaratory relief action that it voluntarily dismissed two years earlier in response to defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 8:33 am by The Docket Navigator
In denying defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law on damages, the court upheld the jury's acceptance of plaintiff's "two-tiered" reasonable royalty analysis. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:45 am
The hearing is due to finish on Thursday.The question, as summarized on the Supreme Court's website, is as follows:Whether a new pemetrexed based cancer treatment produced by Actavis UK Limited and others infringes Eli Lilly and Company’s patent and its foreign designations either indirectly under s. 60(2) of the Patents Act 1977 (matter for appeal) or directly under a proper interpretation of Article 69 of the Europe Patent Convention 2000… [read post]