Search for: "People v. Howes" Results 2041 - 2060 of 31,248
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2014, 1:44 pm by Sandy Levinson
  What is most pervasive, perhaps, is the ever extending polarization, which means not only that "We the People" have strikingly different views on a plethora of important topics, but, perhaps more importantly, that there is no longer a genuine "We the People" because each of the polarized sides increasingly sees their opponents not as fellow citizens but as Others to be demonized. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 3, 2010 in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:07 am by Eric Goldman
For example, online marketplace competitors can use takedown notices to thwart their rivals; or recall how people opposed to sex work were using takedown notices to try to cut off sex workers from payment services. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:13 pm
 Though not at all like 20:1, and it also very much depends on how you use (e.g., snorting vs. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
On 5 December 2014, the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the “Court”) delivered its ground breaking judgment on freedom of expression in Lohé Issa Konaté v Burkina Faso (Application No 004/2013 [pdf] (available only in French). [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 12:40 pm by Eric Goldman
For more on how intermediaries construct consumer associations that may have trademark infringement implications, see my Brand Spillovers paper. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 7:34 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Regardless of how things turn out, AFP and Getty will have to pay some amount of damages. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 11:20 am by Neil Siegel
Supreme Court, Robert Cooter of UC Berkeley Law School and I developed a theory of Congress's taxing power that anticipated, and may have influenced, the Court's taxing power analysis in NFIB v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:00 am
It's funny how things turn out sometimes.Last year, the Supreme Court decided a case involving whether someone could be deported for sharing a small amount of marijuana with friends. [read post]