Search for: "People v. Paul" Results 2041 - 2060 of 2,957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2008, 5:00 am
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 2.0) 1. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
” Inforrm had an article on the new phenomenon of the “TikTok Tabloid,” which sets out how digital technologies are enabling a new form of social surveillance, and the impact this has on people’s private lives. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
This edition is edited by Paul Daly and Colleen Flood, both professors of law. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
Because the government now agrees with petitioner Paul Erlinger that judges cannot constitutionally make that finding, the court appointed Nick Harper, former clerk to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, to argue in support of the judgment below. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
EDITOR’S CHOICE In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Paul C. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:41 pm by WIMS
    House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA), Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), Conference Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-TX), and Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) issued the following statement after President Obama's press conference and said:    "The American people are ready to get serious about tackling our fiscal challenges, but President Obama's budget fails to lead. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The right mounted court challenges with mixed results for decades, until this June when the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority ruled in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by SHG
In the 1968 case Pickering v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:29 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Paul Alan Levy wrote a nice article on the subject of subpoenas to unmask anonymous commentators here. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
  The case was People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:30 am by Francisco MacĂ­as
  Chistopher Columbus at the Royal Court of Spain, by Václav Brožik c.1884 This Easter Sunday, March 31, marks the 521st anniversary of the issuance of the Alhambra Decree. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Regular readers of Short Circuit will remember that the Fifth Circuit made quite a stir when it held, in Jarkesy v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 11:58 pm by Frank Cranmer
All the Chaplains are available to provide pastoral care to people regardless of their faith or belief. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:08 am by SHG
  Fish deconstructs a set of essays published under the title, The Offensive Internet, where freedom loving academics explain why some people's freedom isn't as lovable as others.Fish begins with Justice John Paul Stevens' explanation from McIntyre v. [read post]