Search for: "State v. Words"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 36,210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2020, 3:03 pm
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
The Justices ask about the wording of the 2011 AV Referendum Act and Chambers QC confirms that he will provide the relevant provision which shows the different wording used, which confirms that Parliament is handing over its sovereignty (in contrast to that used in the 2015 Act). 14:17: Dominic Chambers QC reiterates that the 2015 Act contained no requirement for the UK government to implement the result or set a timeline in relation to the referendum. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 12:01 pm
On Wednesday, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Salinas v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:47 am
R (Haney & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice (10 December 2014) Indeterminate sentences and the inadequate funding of rehabilitation during them has posed problems since Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences hamstrung the system. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:29 am
In People v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 9:19 am
In the recently decided Chadbourne & Parke v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:05 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:09 am
Yesterday, the Court heard oral argument in Kawashima v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
The word does not have a fixed legal signification. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit decided in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
State courts will have their own unique rules. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 2:30 pm
V(A)(3) (emphasis added). [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:02 am
Had he established a violation, then it would've been up to the State to rebut the presumption of injury. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 1:54 am
The word “use” in the section is directed to real or material use, not permitted use. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
But to the stated end? [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:24 pm
In other words, a violation of that statute inherently constitutes an injury to the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
Worse for Comphy, the court characterizes the Comphy word mark as descriptive and not commercially strong because the word mark isn’t heavily advertised to consumers. [read post]
27 Nov 2024, 12:47 pm
” Case Citation: Ramos v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 12:00 pm
For instance, United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:48 am
We previously wrote about the First Circuit's decision in Bartlett v. [read post]
