Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Scales" Results 2041 - 2060 of 2,577
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am by Dennis Crouch
The more recent decision in Innovention Toys v MGA Entertainment (Fed Cir., Mar 21 2011) though perhaps less factually clear-cut also ruled that the art there cited was analogous. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:47 am by Eric Turkewitz
New York has successfully been doing this for almost 200 years for verdicts that are unreasonable, since Chief Judge James Kent wrote the following in Coleman v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 5:10 am by Cyberleagle
Proactive obligations of this kind raise serious questions about a state’s compliance with human rights law, due to the high risk that in their efforts to determine whether user content is legal or illegal, platforms will end up taking down users’ legitimate speech at scale. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:16 pm by Robert Chesney
In short, the NCD and Office of the NCD would resemble the structure of the Office of the United States Trade Representative, albeit with a smaller scale. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am by Mandelman
  As I become aware of people doing these things, I confront them and shut them down. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
  The idea of pirates, smugglers, and privateers in the twenty-first century is absurd to most people, including many attorneys. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The invention of the printing press allowed the dissemination of speech on a grand scale. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm by Marty Lederman
  [W]e do not want people to feel undignified when they walk into any place of business and do business that, you know, serves the public. . . . [read post]