Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 2041 - 2060
of 3,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:31 am
This sparked much criticism, including from those who strongly preferred to see Daqduq prosecuted in some American forum (though this camp was itself divided, as some argued against this option if it meant bringing him to the United States). [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm
The Appellate Court's decision was later reversed on Appeal by the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 4:10 am
Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:39 am
Hoover v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:35 am
PharmacyChecker.com v. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 5:17 am
And the United States has a peculiar way of weathering the worst of times and coming out stronger. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
[Courts] recognized a core principle of social responsibility that justified what was then a new form of liability: The purpose of this [product] liability is to ensure that the costs of injuries resulting from defective products are borne by the manufacturers that put such products on the market. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm
" United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 12:17 am
., Giberson blog here.Happily, this week Judge William Canby (above, back row, second from right) gets the Ninth back on track in an admirable new Fourth Amendment decision on computer searches, United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
Perez (11-713), on redistricting the state house, Perry v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm
(Rees v United Kingdom, para 49; Sheffield and Horsham v United Kingdom, para 66; see also Cossey v United Kingdom, paras 43, 46; I v United Kingdom (GC), para 78; Jaremowicz v Poland, para 48 ('right of a man and a woman to marry')) The historical analysis of the original intent behind Article 12 doesn't help. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 8:17 am
Fidel v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm
Flores, was based not on separation-of-powers issues — the core challenge of this new amicus brief — but upon limits the Court found to Congress’s authority to pass laws regulating the states under the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 8:23 am
When it comes to this factual core, though, Covenant's speech was accurate. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 6:43 am
United States (1993) concurrence. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:48 am
One of the things that's so interesting about it is that it forced me to reflect on the extent to which the United States Constitution, usually described as "federal," in fact complies with their essential criterion of textually specific assignment of autonomy rights to sub-national units or, as a complement, designs institutions that can plausibly be described as ways of maintaining the federalism bargain. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
The case is Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm
Kavanaugh is currently a Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
