Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 2061 - 2080 of 3,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2014, 4:36 am by Ben
 He is being held in a high security prison in Västervik, although he recently requested a transfer to a lower safety class unit. [read post]
8 May 2017, 7:55 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
The statute provides some of the broadest definitions of certain key terms in the entire United States Code. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Perry, the plaintiffs challenge California’s voter-adopted ban on same-sex marriage (Proposition 8), and in the other, United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:50 am by PaulKostro
LEE ZIMMERMAN, ET AL., A-1131-11T2, March 27, 2012: New Jersey’s long-arm jurisprudence permits our courts to exercise personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants to the extent permitted by the federal Constitution. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:09 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court strikes again. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
BASF SE had a US subsidiary, BASF Corp., a Delaware corporation with its headquarters in New Jersey. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 6:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Endangered Species Act; Water Rights)Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm by Dr. Mel Kramer
I feel in a somewhat unique position to write this since my superior at the New Jersey State Department of Health, Oscar J. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
When a unit member retired in 2003, the New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System excluded a part of the payments made to the individual for working scheduled vacation days in determining the member's final average salary. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm by Susan Brenner
District Court for the District of New Jersey 2010) (quoting Government of Virgin Islands. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Marina District Development Company, a New Jersey appellate court joins a long line of courts that simply refuse to see the illegal and harmful stereotyping embodied in sex-specific dress codes. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the justices ruled 8-0 that co-conspirators who do not benefit personally from illegal proceeds cannot  be ordered to forfeit property. [read post]