Search for: "State v. Plant" Results 2061 - 2080 of 4,020
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2012, 8:10 am by Steve Hall
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
DesignsRosie Burbidge published her last post as an official GuestKat, providing a tour of some recent design decisions, including Tynan v J4K Sports Ltd [2018] EWHC 3519 and Pulseon OY v Garmin (Europe) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am by Arthur F. Coon
The SWP employs 21 dams and reservoirs, 5 power plants, and 16 pumping plants to move water flowing from the Feather River to the Sacramento River to the Delta, where it is pumped into the California Aqueduct and conveyed south. [read post]
Co., 656 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (finding “direct physical loss or damage” where the release of an unknown substance into a sewage treatment plant caused the plant to shut down, even though structure was not visibly altered); Three Palms Pointe, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
., they have states, or lander, so different authorities are involved. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Rosie Burbidge reports on the Invista v Botes saga. [read post]