Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 2081 - 2100 of 4,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2011, 10:07 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
Costco, for the proposition that the first sale doctrine (§ 109(a)) "does not apply to items manufactured outside of the United States unless they were previously imported and sold in the United States with the copyright holder's permission. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-1125Issue: Whether a citizen’s political and religious speech may constitute provision of “material support or resources” to a foreign terrorist organization (FTO) under the “coordination” rubric of Holder v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:48 am by R. David Donoghue
"  Based upon that contract, plaintiff was not the exclusive copyright holder either in Poland or anywhere in the world where a copyright was held, including in the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 12:01 am by Florian Mueller
-internal antisuit injunction (an instrument of which some United States Senators are, or pretend to be, blissfully ignorant) that would bar Philips from enforcing a U.S. import ban. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 3:39 am by Florian Mueller
If smartphone and tablet computers become immune to injunction requests only because they incorporate large numbers of features, a whole category of patents (with many subcategories) is devalued in the United States, forcing patent holders to rely on injunction-friendlier jurisdictions abroad.Judge Koh's decision was unprecedented and expected at the same time. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 2:58 am by Florian Mueller
Both parties have been granted leave to file pleadings until then.Unlike the situation between IP Bridge and OPPO, the IP Bridge v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:47 pm by Jeremy Malcolm
A justification that the discussion paper gives for this proposal is that Australia's obligations under its Free Trade Agreements with the United States, Singapore and South Korea require it to provide a legal incentive to ISPs to cooperate with rights holders to prevent infringement on their systems and networks. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:47 am by Ben
And in Access Copyright v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 3:28 am
Although the data was not limited to the United States, "it is reasonable to infer that a substantial portion of active accounts holders are based in the United States, particularly in light of the fact that Opposer is a U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
Finally, it is likely that the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit will be the first appellate court to consider and apply Kaiser Gypsum. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
Finally, it is likely that the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit will be the first appellate court to consider and apply Kaiser Gypsum. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
Finally, it is likely that the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit will be the first appellate court to consider and apply Kaiser Gypsum. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:24 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKImmigration LawIllegal Re-Entry Indictment Dismissed; IJ's §212(c) Ruling, Underlying Deportation Violated Due Process United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 12:34 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKImmigration LawIllegal Re-Entry Indictment Dismissed; IJ's §212(c) Ruling, Underlying Deportation Violated Due Process United States v. [read post]