Search for: "People v Person"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 31,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2015, 5:00 pm
DUI law is actually more complex than most people realize, and the recent case of Coffey v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:19 pm
If It’s Hurting So Many People, Why Is the Lawsuit So Specific? [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:51 am
Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 14 (The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and possessions, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, particularly describing the place to be searched and the person and things to be seized.) [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:08 pm
California, United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:23 am
People remember the concrete. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 3:02 am
People v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:47 am
In a 6-0 decision, late last week March 2011, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled in the case of Thomas Vincent v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 2:13 pm
” Case citation: Robertson v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:12 am
People, 2012 V.I. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:34 am
June 2, 2023) Enigma v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 6:35 am
John v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
In the case of Aleman v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:02 am
[Editor: In Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
Merely speeding down the street, even in tandem with another vehicle, does not constitute a "speed contest" within the meaning of that statute (see People v Grund, 14 NY2d 32; see also Shea v Kelly, 121 AD2d 620, 621). [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 12:41 am
In his lifetime the deceased, diagnosed with borderline personality disorder and on medication, became obsessed with the idea of an impending genocide of white people in South Africa. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 11:48 am
Even people like Justice Brennan, who would prefer the second requirement to occasionally obviate the need for the first, have signed onto this test.But Judge Bybee concurs exclusively to argue that the second requirement shouldn't matter -- that as long as the defendant has minimum contacts, it shouldn't matter whether the exercise of personal jurisdiction is fair. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
In Hussain v GMC [2014] EWCA Civ 2246 at [51], Longmore LJ opined, obiter, that the acts of a professional person were to measured against the standards of another professional person: [brackets in the original] I am a little troubled about the Ghosh direction given by the legal assessor in this case. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:19 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:06 am
As Sam Kamin notes over at Co-Op, today the SCT is hearing arguments in Kennedy v. [read post]
