Search for: "People v. Lines"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 11,895
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm
There's a fine line between an intellectual critique and a personal slam. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 4:29 am
A civil rights lawsuit pending in New York in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Upsolve v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:32 pm
Yesterday (Monday, March 4, 2019) a Qualcomm v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Ward v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
Pill LJ disagreed with this line of reasoning: 31. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:19 pm
In last month’s decision in Borough of Duryea v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
The Frye general acceptance test, however, continues to be the standard for determining reliability and admissibility of expert testimony in New York (see People v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:33 am
Juega v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:45 am
Make no mistake: ADC has failed to comply, and contempt is how the court can bring it into line and protect Arizona prisoners. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm
E.g., Frio v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:17 pm
For example, "flashing" people at a bar who want you to flash them. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 10:34 am
Judge Posner, who is out promoting his 40th book, reflected in the interview [see around 8:45-10:45] on his opinion in Crawford v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 6:08 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:02 am
See White v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
He also noted that, adecade before Riley, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the Government's historical right to search without a warrant people and property crossing the border into the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:02 am
California and United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 11:10 am
In the case of Mesić v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:09 pm
That changed with the case of U.S. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 10:47 am
I think that's mostly because 2008 had the moratorium due to Baze v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 12:12 pm
We the People adopted constitutional changes outside of the procedure stipulated in Article V. [read post]
