Search for: "People v. Vice" Results 2081 - 2100 of 2,208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
We’re talking about people with at least an eight digit net worth. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 3:04 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
VICE PRESIDENT HARRIS IS EXPECTED TO HIGHLIGHT IT DURING CAMPAIGN STOPS IN ARIZONA AND MARYLAND TODAY, AND POLLS SUGGEST ABORTION IS STILL A BIG MOTIVATOR FOR PEOPLE TO VOTE, ESPECIALLY FOR DEMOCRATS. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am by Elizabeth Goitein
In a previous post, I described the political landscape for this year’s Section 702 reauthorization debate and noted the view of most observers that Section 702 is unlikely to be reauthorized this year without significant reforms. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:06 am by Benjamin Bissell
Three other people involved in the attack “were treated in the hospital and released by evening. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
” This chapter discusses the attacks on the rule of law by the President and some in his orbit, including: (i) the rule of law; (ii) criticisms of laws by the President; (iii) The Hatch Act; (iv) other examples of violations; (v) military law; and (vi) pardons. 12.2 Rule of Law The President of the United States takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Some view property tax limitations as a sensible constraint on the growth of government, or as a fail-safe to avoid pricing people out of their own homes. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm by Alvaro Marañon, Benjamin Wittes
’” Opponents, like Jen Ellis, Rapid7’s community and public affairs vice president, suggest it would have devastating consequences as criminal groups would shift their focus “towards organisations which are least likely to be able to deal with downtime—for example hospitals, water-treatment plants, energy providers, and schools. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Teresa Chen, Alana Nance, Han-ah Sumner
Vice President Kamala Harris criticized Beijing for undermining the rules-based order and threatening the sovereignty of other South China Sea nations. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am by Simon Lester
Thus, in our view, the findings as regards “threat of injury” in AD investigations are relevant and applicable to the AS investigations and vice-versa. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
As then–Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Kit Bond (R-MO) argued, “It is unacceptable to continue transferring these dangerous detainees when we know that one in four are confirmed or suspected of returning to the fight. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am by Dianne Saxe
:  09-076/09-090/09-091   Superior Fine Papers Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 That means making decisions based not on preconceived notions about what seems to be a tough response to terror but rather upon what will actually enhance the security of this country and the safety of the American people. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The panel is investigating who, including people in Trump’s inner circle, had any role in planning or enabling the worst assault on the Capitol since the War of 1812. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In our view, this hesitation stems from then-Vice Chancellor Leo Strine’s notorious 2003 decision in In Re Oracle Corp. [read post]