Search for: "Press v. State" Results 2081 - 2100 of 17,744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2009, 7:47 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am by INFORRM
This has recently been developed from an understanding of the right as being a relatively narrow one, which is to do with receiving information that others are willing to impart (found in Leander v Sweden (1987) EHRR 43), to a relatively broad one, which now encompasses receiving information held by an organ of the state, free of unjustified administrative obstacles (found in Tarsasag a Szabadsagjogokert v Hungary (2009) ECHR 618 and Kenedi v Hungary (2009) ECHR… [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm by Patricia Hughes
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Samantha Barbas, University at Buffalo School of Law, is interviewed about Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm by Evan George
This unusual full-court press comes in the case of City & County of Honolulu v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(v) Expressions of concern about constitutionalism are often used as a ‘mask’ (p. 35) to conceal political disagreement with populist movements. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 3:14 am by INFORRM
 Section 2 of the Principal Act is amended- (a) by the insertion of the following definition: “‘Act of 2015’ means the Legal Services Regulation Act 2015;”, (b) by the substitution of the following definition for the definition of “periodical”: “‘periodical’ means— (a) any newspaper, magazine, journal or other publication that is printed, published or issued, or that circulates, in the State at regular or substantially… [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
2016 has been a tough year for Section 230 jurisprudence, and the nadir (so far) was the appellate court ruling in Hassell v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:23 am by Gritsforbreakfast
It'd be one thing if they cut vocational ed and counted the expense as savings, but just spending money cut from an anti-recidivism program to keep one more prison open shows there are unseen forces pressing the Lege to avoid closing even a single unit. [read post]