Search for: "Does 1 - 33"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 6,149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm
With its letter of 13 May 2016, the appellant filed a new main request and auxiliary requests 1 to 5. [read post]
5 May 2021, 11:04 am
With respect to the terms and conditions of employment specified in its Article 3(1), the Directive would mandate the application of the law of the Member State where the work is carried out, rather than of the law applicable to the employment contract under the Rome I Regulation (points 29 to 33). [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:55 am
In its decision issued on Tuesday, March 24, the Court appears to have decided another case entirely, holding (1) that opinions themselves are not facts and cannot provide the basis for 33 Act liability as such (unless not genuinely held by the speaker at the time), but (2) that a statement of opinion is actionable as an omission if it implies that the speaker had a reasonable factual basis for the opinion when the speaker had no such grounds for the statement. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:09 pm
After reviewing the origins, evolution and limits of the writ of habeas corpus under state law, the Court concluded that the general rule in G.S. 17-4(2) is subject to the exception in G.S. 17-33(2),which provides that discharge of a lawful term of imprisonment may be based upon “some act, omission or event” that takes place after the judgment is entered. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 8:30 pm
Toomey, 157 Cal.App.3d 1, 14, 203 Cal.Rptr. 642 (1984). [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:12 am
This does not, he assures her, mean that she will not have a place to sit. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
"A landmark Supreme Court decision 33 years ago gave criminal defendants the right to represent themselves at trial. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:53 am
” Under 14 Penn Plaza, Section 626(c)’s authorization of court actions does not create a Section 626(f)(1) “right. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
P'ship, 432 F.3d 1327, 1332-33 (11th Cir. 2005); Contec Corp. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 12:53 am
Politically Example: 革命小酒 (in class 33 for goods of liquor, wine, etc.) [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:10 pm
” Slip Op. 10-11, citing ’251 Patent at 13:27–33. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:30 pm
Rocha does fall under any of the exclusions permitting unpaid labour enumerated under the ss. 1(2) or 3(5) of ESA or s. 2(1) of O. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 8:43 pm
Pet. at 33-34. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:48 am
" Decision as PrecedentialPrededential No. 34: TTAB Affirms Refusal to Register "Beer Glass and Stand" Packaging for Lack of Distinctiveness Fraud: Precedential No. 36: TTAB Refuses to Find Fraudulent Intent Where Applicant Relied on Advice of CounselPrecedential No. 16: Fraud Claim Survives Motion to Dismiss; Facts Pleaded with Sufficient ParticularityPrecedential No. 2: TTAB Okays Fraud Pleading But Denies Summary Judgment on Intent Issue Genericness: Precedential No. 45: TTAB Finds… [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 3:46 pm
Because the complaint does not expressly state factual allegations negating the exception, defendant argues that the complaint is jurisdictionally defective. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
Marshall[1] that the congressional grant of jurisdiction to bankruptcy courts to issue final judgments on counterclaims to proofs of claim was unconstitutional. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
China in Africa: Essays 1. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
This principle is not a rule: the law does permit wrong doers to profit from their wrongs in a variety of circumstances. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
In any event, responsibility does not require a formal agreement between the controllers as regards the purposes and means of processing (para 44). [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
