Search for: "Grant v. People"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 16,996
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2012, 6:41 am
As Joey notes, the state recipients of federal grants for the poor hold the beneficiaries of the federal grant hostage: If the federal government pulls the grant to enforce some condition on that grant, then the beneficiaries of the federal program -- the very people whom the federal agency wants to help by enforcing the federal law -- suffer. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Background on the King v. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 9:36 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:21 pm
”) State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Conservation Comm'n v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
Bruen and RahimiTwo years ago, in New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:02 am
I realize that to most people it's not even the fifth-most-interesting case decided this week, but I was particularly surprised and pleased to see Chief Justice Roberts's concurrence on Monday in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 10:00 am
See People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
Unusually, permission to appeal was granted (by Lewison LJ) on the basis of the “some other compelling reason for the appeal to be heard” limb of CPR 52.6(1), having regard to the novelty of the claim and the procedure for dealing with it, the public interest in data breaches, the number of people affected and the potential sums of money involved. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:57 am
The case is Stone v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
In People v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 1:22 pm
Last Friday a divided Appellate Division, Fourth Department ruled that an extended investigation resulting from a tinted-windows stop was illegal, and suppressed drugs, dismissed drug possession, assault 2, resisting arrest and OGA convictions as a result (People v Edwards, 2009 WL 2635784 [4th Dept 8/28/09]). [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 12:44 pm
In Eads v. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 12:20 pm
Annabelle Bennett, in the audience, commented that the patent is the right to exclude: "Previously, in the ordinary patent sense, people would come to court and almost automatically be granted an injunction. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 10:40 am
Khouri (State Taxation - Tobacco)Wilson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:20 pm
People v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
That was the question addressed by the New York State Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
" Osho Friends International v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 11:35 pm
In Jacobsen v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 9:22 am
Guthrie v. [read post]
