Search for: "Land v. State" Results 2101 - 2120 of 13,218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2014, 5:11 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Second, the right to property inherently has difficulty providing even basic protection for ancestral lands because domestic and international law grants states wide latitude to interfere with property. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:03 am by Lyle Denniston
United States (and 11-5721 – Hill v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V (1) Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own nationals under this Treaty but the executive authority of each Contracting Party shall have the power to deliver them up if, in its discretion, it considers that it is proper to do so. (2) For the purposes of this Article - (a) a reference to the executive authority of a Contracting Party shall, in the case of Australia, be construed as a reference to the Attorney-General of Australia; (b) Australian… [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Oscar Markus
It is now the law of the land that states can not only prohibit—but affirmatively criminalize—abortion. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 2:39 pm by SJM
DH v Czech Republic para. 207) Zrilic v Croatia 3/10/13 Between 1992 and 2005 the applicant shared a property in Croatia with her husband. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 5:42 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
” Moreover, the condition in the bond need not be the payment of money, and could relate to the transfer or vesting of interests in land. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:51 pm
  The majority opinion holds that under the federal venue statute, you have to charge the defendant in the state that the aircraft was flying over at the particular time of the assault, not (as here) merely in the venue in which the plane landed. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 1:34 pm by NARF
 Learn more about the vacancy at: https://www.narf.org/contact-us/join-team/ State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html Grossman v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 12:16 pm by Steven G. Tyler
One relevant exception to the general rule was stated in the Yorkdale case, where retrospective application is given to changes to statutes that impact land use issues made during the course of litigation in land use and zoning cases, unless vested or accrued substantive rights would be disturbed or the legislature had shown a contrary intent. [read post]
17 May 2018, 10:00 pm by Joe
Winthrop, inherited numerous pieces of land over the course of several decades. [read post]