Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 2101 - 2120 of 19,833
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2015, 9:48 am by David Greene
Yesterday marked a frustrating juncture in EFF’s long-running lawsuit against mass surveillance, Jewel v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:37 am
 Because the Regulation merely limited the "use" of trade marks they did not strip away the trade mark owner;s right to prevent or exclude others from using their mark (citing Arnold J in Pinterest v Premium Interest). [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:35 am
 Infringement by sofosbuvir (which Gilead markets under the trade mark Sovaldi) is swiftly established in 10 paragraphs at almost the end of a 621-paragraph whopper - Gilead is held to have infringed. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 11:55 am by Nedim Malovic
Bad faith pursuant to Article 59(1)(b) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR), presupposes the presence of a dishonest state of mind or intention (Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO (C‑104/18 P)). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:06 pm
However, the recent Opinion of Advocate General (AG) Bobek in case C-702/18, Primart Marek Łukasiewicz v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 9:48 pm
 Mark Bennett wonders why then did the Texas Attorney General even bother to weigh in on the amicus brief.Good question.Here’s a portion from the intro:If the States choose to do so, the Constitution permits them to provide their citizens with protections above and beyond those embodied in the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:21 am
[Section 2(d) refusals to register the mark ECLIPSE for various goods relating to motion pictures and entertainment, in classes 9, 14, 18, 24, and 25, in view of, respectively, several class 9 registrations for the identical mark, a registration of the identical mark for watches in class 14, three registration in class 18 for ECLIPSE, ECLIPZE, and ECLIPS & Design, a class 24 registration of ECLIPSE for curtains, and a class 25 registration of the identical… [read post]