Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 6,917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2006, 3:03 pm
I work in the non-profit realm of Criminal Defense...meaning that my paycheck has not quite reached the prestige of a Public Defender (and I say that tongue in check...for those who ought to know better) Don't get me wrong, I love my job, my co-workers, are for the most part phenomenal people. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:49 am
Accordingly, we affirm the default judgment as it pertains to the Cohens and the Corporate Defendants because the record evidence establishes, clearly and convincingly, that these litigants have engaged in a massive and unprecedented scheme to defraud the trial court below.Not a pretty picture (I don't mean the hot tub -- I love that picture!). [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 1:15 pm
We don't think the dental board will go back to its bad behavior. [read post]
27 May 2012, 6:38 am
Drop out if you can't follow them all because we'll jail you if you don't. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
I don't know how this will all play out -- the at-issue doctrine can be broad or narrow, depending on the circumstances and the court. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:16 am
Don't. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 8:42 am
Bernier III, "(Almost) Everything We Learned about Pleasing Bankruptcy Judges, We Learned in Kindergarten" (Abstract ID: 1157103) *** Stetson University's Michael S. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:00 am
We don't know what the Chief Judges are doing to address this problem, but lets approach it from another angle- WHAT EVER YOU ARE DOING IS NOT WORKING!! [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:27 am
""We don't fire people here. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Don't get too close to Larry Kudlow, or some of that foam around his mouth is likely to spray you. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 11:25 am
Those dangers are still real, and we will continue to defend against them. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm
dealing with things we’ve come across that we haven’t yet blogged about this week.Medical Device Preemption ? [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 9:04 pm
But in our system we don't live by mob rule. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 11:45 am
I don't believe it, particularly since he declined to identify them. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 11:11 am
Held: “Because the denial of Repp's motion is not a final or appealable collateral order, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal and must dismiss it. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:08 am
Whatever the intentions behind the creation of the CAF may have been, let's judge the entity by its track record of now approximately two years. [read post]
19 May 2009, 5:00 am
What we said in that prior post - ""Justice Patel" sounds pretty good to us" - is even more relevant today.And speaking of relevance, if you're playing in the third-party payor/RICO sandbox, don't overlook Actimmune. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 2:15 am
(We weren't the only two, and it wasn't really all that private, but it's my blawg and I get to embellish the story the way I want.)The actual subject of the seminar was something like improving the jury experience. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 8:11 am
Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007), conclusive photos and videos can entitle the defendant to summary judgment even if the plaintiff's testimony would otherwise create a factual dispute for trial.This is a summary order, so we don't know all the facts, but the first thing that comes to mind here is that if the truck is coming at plaintiff on the side of the road, he would not able to protect himself and take a picture at the same time. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 7:25 am
Former House Intelligence Committee ranking member Jane Harman described in 2008 how congressional "notification" works: …as far as notes go, you—I suppose one could take some notes but they would have to be carried around in a classified bag, which I don’t personally own. [read post]
