Search for: "Michael Washington v."
Results 2121 - 2140
of 2,831
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2014, 6:11 am
General Assembly Adjourns without Budget or Medicaid Expansion Washington Post – Laura Vozella, Michael Laris, and Rachel Weiner | Published: 3/8/2014 Virginia lawmakers passed an omnibus ethics reform bill that sets a $250 annual limit on the amount of certain gifts elected officials can accept from lobbyists, principals, and anyone who has or is seeking business with the state. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:07 pm
According to the Washington Post, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Edward R. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm
The organisation is also pushing for Washington to pass the Journalism Competition & Preservation Act, which would allow news publishers to collectively negotiate better terms with tech platforms. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Fox Michael E. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:22 am
Buchanan and Michael C. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am
” According to the Washington Post, the order was drafted in mere “hours. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:10 am
On Tuesday 30 July 2024 there was a statement in open court in the case of Singh v Cartland and a return date hearing the case of Synnovis Services v Persons Unknown. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
Paul v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
There was also a strike out application in the case of Vince v Associated Newspapers Limited. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Afro-IP)Australia Professor Fitzgerald’s opinion article ‘It’s vital to sort out ownership of ideas’: (IP:KCE)BrazilBrazil wrestles with decision on GM corn, seed patenting: (Intellectual Property Watch),PTO recognized as international patent search authority: (International Law Office)CanadaTrade mark statistics - CIPO 2006-2007 Annual Report: (Canadian Trademark Blog)IP injunctions in Canada: (ipblog.ca),Professor Ariel Katz’ research project on… [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Although “The Anthony Kennedy Show” has now been superseded by what will surely be an entertaining but entirely predictable renewal of “The Confirmation Show: Now Even More Evasive,” it is still valuable to consider Justice Kennedy’s hand in the Supreme Court’s hard-right turn that paid off so handsomely for conservative activists this year.In some ways, the most perversely interesting opinion that the Court’s Conservative Five handed down last month was in… [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:00 pm
The conduct was certainly disturbing, but the court, in Washington v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:39 pm
Mayer Kohn, A World After Tincher v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
The Guardian, BBC, Reuters, Independent, Washington Post, Press Gazette, GB News, the Los Angeles Times and Zelo Street reported. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(Docket Report) District Court E D Washington: False marking claim defeated at summary judgment – Employee mistakes do not constitute false marking: Bow Jax Inc. v. [read post]
