Search for: "State v. Words" Results 2121 - 2140 of 36,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2017, 2:28 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This is because the classic rule is that a statutory provision does not bind the Crown save by express words or ‘necessary implication’. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 2:09 pm
  Since the United States Supreme Court rendered its landmark decision in Schware v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In addition, the Commissioner noted New York State's Court of Appeals recently sustained the validity of New York’s early mail voter statute, citing Stefanik v Hochul, 2024 NY Slip Op 04236. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In addition, the Commissioner noted New York State's Court of Appeals recently sustained the validity of New York’s early mail voter statute, citing Stefanik v Hochul, 2024 NY Slip Op 04236. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]