Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor" Results 2121 - 2140 of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2013, 1:54 pm
 Sure, maybe Judge Taylor thought that there was sufficient evidence. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:23 pm
Click here to find outLantana the movie hereLatest Australian jurisprudence on the same issue in Research Affiliates LLC v Commissioner of Patents [2014] FCAFC 150, noted on Patentology here. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 9:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1993) (quoting Sands,Taylor & Wood Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Burnham and UFT, 28 PERB 4590, PERB ruled that the union's "duty of fair representation" runs only to employees; there is no such duty with respect to former unit members such as retirees [See, also,  McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326; Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344].** Retirees are not employees for the purposes of collective bargaining for the purposes of Article 14 of the Civil Service Law [the Taylor Law] The decision is… [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 In Hall v Environmental Conservation, 235 A.D.2d 757, the employer boycotted the disciplinary arbitration because it believed that Hall was not entitled to the disciplinary arbitration. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
The case is Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:59 am by Ben
The case is Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch). [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 10:01 pm by Cookson Beecher
Although Taylor Shellfish had to shut down its Samish Bay growing operation for two months last summer because of V. parahaemolyticus, it has farms in other parts of the state where it could harvest oysters intended for the raw market. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
General Municipal Law Section 209-m is operative only with respect to police departments having police officers in a negotiating unitParadiso v Loeffler, 2009 NY Slip Op 01986, Decided on March 17, 2009,The Village of Ocean Beach rejected Edward T. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 8:32 pm
  Consider then, the alleged infringing “Bodyfat Analyzer and Scale” products in the recent suit, Tanita Corp. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 10:32 am by Lyle Denniston
Strieff — need to suppress evidence seized under an outstanding warrant discovered during an investigatory stop later found to be illegal Tuesday, February 23: Taylor v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:39 am by INFORRM
As he said in A v B, “The [public figure] should recognise that because of his public position he must expect and accept that his actions will be more closely scrutinised by the media. [read post]