Search for: "United States v. Little" Results 2121 - 2140 of 10,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm by Danny Jacobs
It turns out in 1923 he made a bronze scuplture, “Bird in Space,” that he shipped to the United States in 1927. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-6602; Cox v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:54 am by Gretchen Harders
On March 26, 27 and 28, 2012, the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”) heard oral arguments in a series of cases, including Department of Health and Human Services, et al. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Let’s assume that the foreign defendant has no attorney or other agent in the United States to whom constitutionally adequate notice could be given. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:43 am by Matrix Law
In this post, Ross Ludlow, Legal Support Assistant at Matrix Chambers, comments on the case of R v Maughan (Northern Ireland) [2022] UKSC 13. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:32 am by Kent Scheidegger
The United States Supreme Court today granted a stay of execution pending its resolution of a certiorari petition to Lester Leroy Bower, who was found guilty of four counts of capital murder 31 years ago in Texas. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) states that “An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled . . . is inadmissible”, and the BIA held in Matter of V-X-, 26 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 2013) , that a grant of asylum is not an “admission” for these purposes, leaving asylees subject to the grounds of inadmissibility (although with the proviso that they cannot be removed unless their asylum status is terminated). [read post]
17 May 2017, 6:52 am by Eric Goldman
State Farm Mutual * Court Orders Plaintiff to Turn Over Facebook and MySpace Passwords in Discovery Dispute — Zimmerman v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:46 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Alliance, with claimsfound obvious:Following a trial for patent infringement that resulted in a hung jury, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled as a matter of law that U.S. [read post]
  Therefore, the law invited the high standard of “strict scrutiny” by the court because, according to the US Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]