Search for: "V D" Results 2121 - 2140 of 76,323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2022, 2:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Less commonly, you may receive guidance about (a) which of these liability exposures are (or may not be) covered under your directors’ and officers’ liability insurance (D&O) policy and (b) how well the standard D&O cover tracks and responds to emerging executive risks. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 9:30 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Amador County Opening Brief DOI Answer Brief Lower court materials in Amador County v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:17 am
(in support of the petitioner)Amicus brief of Professor Richard D. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:19 am by tracey
Delaney v Pickett and another; [2011] EWCA Civ 1532;  [2011] WLR (D)  390 “In looking to the possible application of the defence of ‘ex turpi’ in a claim of negligence arising out of a road traffic accident it could be crucial to ask whether the injury in issue was truly a consequence of the claimant’s unlawful act or whether it was a consequence of the unlawful act only in the sense that it would not have happened if the claimant… [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 8:57 am
JT (Cameroon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 878; [2008] WLR (D) 260 “When construing s 8(1) of the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc) Act 2004, which provided various factors that the court should take account of in assessing the credibility of an asylum seeker, the qualifying word "potentially" should be read into an explanatory clause which would then read: ‘as (potentially) damaging the… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 3:49 am by traceydennis
Rymer v Director of Public Prosecutions [2010] EWHC 1848 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 197 “A defendant who had pleaded guilty by post in response to a written charge in respect of summary offences and who had been convicted by the justices in his absence pursuant to s 12(4) of the Magistrates’ Court Act 1980 did not have an automatic right to change his plea at a resumed hearing after the case had been adjourned for sentencing pursuant to s 12(5) of the 1980 Act. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 1:47 am
R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council [2008] UKHL 14; WLR (D) 64 “A child who had been provided with accommodation by the housing department of a local authority but had not been brought to the attention of their children's services department had not been ‘looked after’ under s 22(1) of the Children Act 1989 and was accordingly not entitled, having reached 18, to support under the Act as a ‘former relevant… [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:37 am by traceydennis
Batista v Secretary of State of the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 896; [2010] WLR (D) 233 “When considering whether a decision to deport a national of the European Economic Area (‘EEA’) was proportionate, the court should ask itself whether members of the deportee’s family would move to the country of origin with the deportee and whether it was reasonable to expect them to do so, rather than to ask whether there were ‘insurmountable obstacles’… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 2:18 am by sally
Rymer v Director of Public Prosecutions [2010] EWHC 1848 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 197 “A defendant who had pleaded guilty by post in response to a written charge in respect of summary offences and who had been convicted by the justices in his absence pursuant to s 12(4) of the Magistrates’ Court Act 1980 did not have an automatic right to change his plea at a resumed hearing after the case had been adjourned for sentencing pursuant to s 12(5) of the 1980 Act. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:38 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Corp., Civ.A.No. 89-484-CMW, 1990 WL 160666, at*1 (D. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 8:28 am
On February 3, 2015, Judge Edward Chen of California’s Northern District issued an order in Hernandez v. [read post]