Search for: "Young v. State"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 8,887
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2012, 12:00 am
In this first part, we look at the present state of the complex relationship between Apple and Samsung: bitter rivals in the courts on one hand, multi-billion dollar supplier and customer on the other. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:43 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court decided Hall v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 10:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:20 am
R (on the application of HA (Nigeria)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 979 (Admin) – Read judgment The detention of a mentally ill person in an Immigration Removal Centre (IRC) amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment and false imprisonment, and was irrational, the High Court has ruled. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:12 am
Young, 2013 U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
Scott V. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:12 pm
State Hist. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 1:13 pm
Georgia, Coker v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 4:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 12:33 pm
Young) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2011 collision and sued for damages. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:17 am
In Rowe v Vargason, 2011 WL 4529341 (D. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm
The Legislature has never hesitated to expressly state its intent to legislatively overrule a Louisiana Supreme Court decision, when that is indeed its intent. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:15 am
Chief Justice Young wrote a concurrence in the vacation and denial, stating that although criminal defendants have a right to an impartial juryand to a fair trial, the Constitution does not require unconditionally that jurors not discuss the case among themselves before the matter is submitted to them for decision. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:48 am
Birchfield v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 6:16 am
Facts: This case (Bratt et al v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
(Designers Guild Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:45 am
Our case, Garza v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 10:09 am
One especially memorable case was Finkel v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:17 pm
In State v. [read post]
