Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
I regarded the appeal as having merit and I also considered that it would give this court the opportunity to give any necessary guidance as to the limits of the application of the observations of Lord Neuberger in Holmes-Moorhouse v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
The Supreme Court hearing is to take place on Wednesday 13 and Thursday 14 July 2011 and will be heard by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins of Mapesbury and Lord Clarke. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Tex. 2005) (Jack, J.)). [9] Mississippi Valley Silica Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
The Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas, Lord Camden, rejected this argument with flourish. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
That proposition was effectively trumped by Terry Gallivan, Counsel for Islington, who relied on the contrary proposition in Akinbolu v Hackney LBC (1997) 29 HLR 259, 269 as well as that old chestnut R v Sec of State for the Environment ex p Tower Hamlets LBC [1993] QB 632, 643, neither of which had been cited to Collins J. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:36 am
♫ Oh, Lord, stuck in a lawsuit again. ♫Fraud. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
Lord Leggatt in Lloyd emphasized the spirit of flexibility of representative actions. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 4:58 pm
Lord Leggatt handed down the unanimous judgement in favour of the appellant Google LLC: “the claim has no real prospect of success. [read post]
21 May 2019, 4:00 am
In the notorious 1959 Roncarelli v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:12 am
In the courts: The Mayor of London v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:53 pm
In the first, Tower Hamlets v The Times, the newspaper was ‘ordered’ to publish a summary of the adjudication. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:29 am
In his judgement Lord Justice Davis stated that the offender's conduct was sustained and persistent, even after receiving cease and desist notices, for a lengthy period of time; Evans also used sophisticated equipment for the purpose [at 19]. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:54 am
The UK House of Lords has also said in Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union (1995) 2 AC 513 (HL) that a situation where the executive never enforces a statute while continuing another legislation can never arise. [read post]
25 May 2015, 7:04 am
If other State law requires information to be furnished in a conspicuous manner, UETA §8 states that you can furnish the information electronically, but must do so in a conspicuous manner. [read post]
11 May 2009, 11:38 am
That decision is now been appealed to the Lords, to be heard in July 2009. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am
The National Security Bill was read for the first time in the House of Lords. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
Ward LJ, giving the leading judgment made it clear that the courts were bound by the decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN (No.2). [read post]
