Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2141 - 2160
of 4,050
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Ad [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
Panetta (Al-Awlaki v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:24 pm
Garcia did not, as a final barrier to her copyright claim, fix her work in any tangible form; a requisite element under copyright in the United States for an interest in the work to arise. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
The celebration of two decades of the House of Lords patent biopatent ruling in Biogen v Medeva, hosted by Rouse, is happily recorded on PatLit by Rouseniks Mary Smillie and Catriona Smith. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
As the Telegraph reports, details of Lord Mandelson’s visit to a Siberian steam ‘banya‘ were disclosed during Rothschild v Associated Newspapers, heard last week by Tugendhat J, without a jury. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:04 am
Lady Justice Smith stated that it was possible in principle for an estoppel by res judicata to be created by a Tomlin Order, although it would often be more difficult to determine precisely what issues had been compromised, as the terms of a Tomlin Order would not be made public. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:17 am
The Secretary of State must act with reasonable diligence to progress deportation. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
In Kilby et al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 9:00 am
The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland), heard 8-9 March 2016. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
Lord Dyson gives the leading judgment, with which Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Brown and Lord Mance agree. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:01 am
In the UK House of Lords decision of Blathwayt v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:46 am
Lord Justice Lloyd and Lord Justice Elias both gave concurring judgments. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 9:09 am
He must not consciously mis-state the facts. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
See today’s In the courts Luton Borough Council & Nottingham City Council & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin) (11 February 2011): Coalition cancellation of school-building program was unlawful. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 6:42 pm
"Praise the Lord! [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 9:57 am
In the Supreme Court's recent standing decision, Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:36 am
In the same case, the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) made clear that there was nothing in the UK legislation to prevent workers from taking holiday during a period of sickness absence. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 3:22 pm
As Lord Neuberger put it at para 23 of Arnold v Britton: Seventhly, reference was made in argument to service charge clauses being construed “restrictively”. [read post]
